Central and Eastern European transition experiences and the Arab Spring

My article posted on the Euro Middle East Forum.



The goal of this short paper is to provide some background information for the first debate of the Euro Middle East Forum organised in 2013 on the occasion of the second anniversary of the uprisings that shook the Middle East in the early part of 2011. This first conference will focus on the lessons learnt from the Central and Eastern European transition experience from dictatorship to democracy, a long process that took almost 20 years, which could be applicable to the Arab countries in the current context. The topics of the second and third debates will be announced later on.

EU10 transition experience
In the last two decades, Central and Eastern European countries have experienced fundamental changes in their political and economic regimes as a consequence of the fall of the former Soviet block. These changes involved fundamental transformations of virtually every aspect of their political, economic and social life.

The fall of the communist system entailed challenges of similar kinds for all these countries: achieving a power deal between existing political forces; tackling economic problems in the transition period; establishing the rule of law; reforming the police, the judiciary and the administration; supporting the development of political parties and of civil society organisations; promoting a free and independent media; etc.

Every country, however, took its own path in addressing them[1]. This was due, on the one hand, to the internal differences in their respective political regimes, economic systems and social settings, and, on the other hand, to the diverse relationship with the hegemonic power and the Soviet Communist Party. The historical, social, political and economic diversity of Eastern and Central European countries at the beginning of their transition, together with their respective capacity for reforms, have deeply influenced the way and the extent of this transition process.

The 10 Eastern European Member States that joined the EU in 2004 and 2007 possess a wealth of knowledge in managing these long, complex processes. The experiences of these countries during their transition – including their expertise in the use of foreign assistance in support of such a difficult process – are source of inspiration and present a great utility for other countries and regions benefiting from the EU’s assistance and cooperation programmes.

The Arab Spring and the transition

On the surface, there appear to be strong similarities between the ongoing developments in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and the events that unfolded in Central and Eastern Europe in the late 1980s and early 1990s. However, there are at least three reasons to believe that the continuing political transitions in the Arab world are likely to be considerably more difficult than those experienced by the countries of the former Eastern Bloc two decades ago[2]. These reasons are:
  • The absence of external positive incentives: Many Central and Eastern European countries reformed with their eyes fixed on European Union membership. The hardships associated with difficult political transitions are evidently easier to tolerate with the promise of an ultimate reward. Unfortunately, no such incentives are currently available to countries in the Middle East and North Africa. Whether they could be created, and what form they would take, remains an important question.
  • Weak civil society organizations: The collapse of socialism in Europe was also the product of  determined civil society efforts, and these movements emerged as credible actors and leaders in the new and reformed system. The agent of change in the MENA region, while influenced by civil society activism, was a more spontaneous popular outburst. Civil society in much of the region remains weak, fragmented, and divided between tainted organizations closely identified with the fallen regimes and new, often ephemeral ones. A proactive drive towards engagement led by Western civil society organizations, on a peer-to-peer basis, may help energize their MENA counterparts.
  • A less conducive geopolitical climate: The collapse of the Soviet Union created, at least for some time, a unipolar international order. The transatlantic alliance was able to forcefully step in as an enabler and facilitator of the Central and Eastern Europe’s transition. Today, the external influence is far more diversified. Beyond the Western partners, players such as Russia, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia line up to influence the so-called Arab Spring for their own purposes. The path towards a smooth transition, supported by a transatlantic alliance working in the same direction, as it was the case in Central and Eastern Europe in the nineties, appears much less straightforward.
Despite these differences, there is still hope. There is a will for reform among emerging new political powers, and a process that has started, how difficult it is, in three countries of the Arab spring. These countries are those which experienced a revolution, or uprising, and which have initiated a transition process, combined with a significant political regime change and the absence of major armed conflict. Those countries are, at this stage, Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. It is difficult to summarise, in a few lines, two years of events and somewhat chaotic developments, but we have tried to identify here after the main challenges that those three countries have faced over that period in their transformation.

Tunisia

By any measure, Tunisia has probably the best chance among the Arab Spring countries to transition to democracy but the necessary key issues are identified as follows. 

The nature of the political regime and government (presidential, parliamentary etc. ) and the electoral law itself are still under discussion. It is an ongoing process, but, up to now, the National Constituent Assembly failed to meet its promise and to bring about real accomplishments on these matters. For these reasons, consensual legitimacy necessitates a broader agreement over the key issues within the road map of the transitional stage.

The reform of the Ministry of Interior needs to be another priority, including vetting the potential new managers in order to clean the internal security sector. The violence of the police against peaceful demonstrators has been seen at several occasions until recently. On the other side, some extremist religious groups have brought violence against secular groups, in a climate of relative impunity. Ensuring the independence of the judiciary and transitional justice is another issue. There is a need to continue the efforts on prosecutions.

The language that defines women’s rights, and protections of free speech and religion, including press freedom needs to be better included in the laws and in the constitution. Amnesty International released a report in October saying that the draft constitution, “fails to fully uphold freedom of expression as it includes provisions criminalizing attacks against religion and ‘sacred values.’”

Last but not least, the economic situation is a big concern. GDP contracted by an estimated 1.5 percent and unemployment jumped to over 18 percent in 2011, amid rising twin fiscal and current account deficits. The outlook for the economy hinges on the political transition and the external environment. Despite earlier reforms, a level playing field has not been established in many sectors, and steps to improve the business environment have not yet been taken.

Libya

Just over a year ago, the world watched as Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan dictator of 42 years, was captured and killed brutally. With his death, a seven-month NATO intervention came to an end and a door opened to a better future for the Libyan people. Libya had considerable advantages compared with its neighbours. It was wealthy, the region was relatively stable, and the rebel victory was uncontested.

A notable achievement in the new Libya is the successful election of the General National Congress where Libyans were allowed to choose their representatives. The Congress’ work has been plagued by party politics struggles as well as regional struggles, but so far it has proved its commitment to the rule of law and constitutional values.

The July 2012 election was successful. But there has been little progress in other key areas. Weak state institutions, quasi absence of political parties and civil society institutions, and lack of media outlets are probably the biggest obstacle towards a democratic system. A major task, now that the new government has been formed, is to intensify consultations and reach decisions regarding the constitutional process, starting with the establishment of a Constitutional Commission. The process will not be easy and will include many political and regional obstacles, but the key for Libya’s success in this process will depend on its inclusiveness, transparency and fairness.

Security remains a major concern: there is a continuous abundance of weapons on the streets and the diverse armed “brigades” in the country with unclear lines of command and control. Interim Prime Minister Ali Zeidan vowed to improve the security situation in the country and appointed two very experienced and skilled individuals without any political affiliations to fill the posts of Ministers of Interior and Defence. However, the battles between some militias still lead to unacceptable human right abuses. It remains also just as urgent for the Libyan authorities to fully activate the judiciary so that perpetrators are held to account and rule of law upheld.

Finally, despite the wealth of the country, unemployment is very high among the young population, thousands of graduates are currently struggling to find decent jobs. Libya's energy resources have provided a relatively high standard of living—per-capita income of just over $12,000 in 2010—but it can even more enjoy the promise of a bright future and financial grounds for building a new state. Successful transition in Libya will ultimately require the growth of private enterprise outside the hydrocarbon industry.

Egypt

Egypt, due to its huge population, its situation at the crossroads of the East and the West and its importance in the region was the most promising Arab Spring country but the best we can say about the process so far is that it has been painful.

In February 2011, Hosni Mubarak stepped down, leaving the way for an interim military government which has lead to many human right abuses. The first democratic election gave a huge Islamist majority in the Parliament, but its result was annulled by a court in June. Shortly after, Mohammed Mursi of the Muslim Brotherhood was chosen as the first freely elected President in the history of Egypt. During the summer, the president dismissed the leaders of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces and replaced them with more consensual elements from the Army. Since then, the battle has been raging with the judiciary, mostly appointed during the Mubarak regime, although the clash over legality also occurred with reformist judges, formerly opposed to Mubarak. The constitution was written by an assembly, from which most of the secular and liberal members resigned, giving it a highly divisive character. The ratification of the constitution infuriated secular, Christian and women's groups and the liberal opposition. They say the constitution does not provide sufficient guarantees for freedom of expression and women's rights. Other institutions like the trade unions and the media are under threat of what has been called a “brotherhoodization” of the State. Dominant party overreach, concentration of power, a fragmented opposition remain probably the most important challenges.

On another note, the police and security establishments must be transformed into effective, accountable, and politically neutral law-enforcement bodies that deliver human security and protect human rights. Downsizing the security services to a number consonant with its professional mission is vital. Basically, the judiciary power, inherited from the dictatorship, needs to be reformed, but with mechanisms that keep it independent from the legislative and the executive powers.

One of the biggest concerns in Egypt, if not the most important, is the economic situation which has been declining since January 2011. The bureaucracy, coupled with a huge corruption system, makes economic and social reform a very difficult challenge that could eventually lead to the complete failure of the revolution. On the same note, arranging the disengagement of Egypt’s military from government and the economy is yet another challenge that will keep any civilian government busy for at least the next decade.

Shared challenges

Beyond finding national compromises to achieve necessary power deals making the transition sustainable, the institutional reform as regard to internal security, judiciary and transitional justice is common to the three countries as well as economic progress and fight against unemployment. 

The goal of the presentation and the debate will be to identify in the following topics, which elements are important and could be a source of inspiration in the Arab transitions contexts.

Achieving a power deal. Could the Round Table talks and agreements in Poland, Hungary serve as a model to achieve a power deal?

Tackling economic problems in a transition period. What is common between a post-communist economy and a deeply bureaucratic and corrupted system and how to overcome it ?

Internal security and rule of law. What is the role of the police and the army? how to reform such powerful institutions without turning them against the democratic transition ?

Reform of the judiciary. Guarantees for the independence of the judiciary, separation of powers; transitional justice between desire for revenge and necessity of moving forward. 

Promoting healthy and diversified political parties. One of the major pillars in a democracy.

Support to the development of civil society organisations.

Promotion of a free and independent media.

References: 


Haifa Zaiter. A Year After Tunisia's Elections, Cracks Appear in Ruling Troika. Translated from As-Safir (Lebanon). http://www.al-monitor.com 25/10/2012.

Isobel Coleman, Tunisia’s Transition Continues, CFR blogs, 23 October 2012.

Special Rapporteur Pablo de Greiff, Human rights must be at centre of Tunisia’s transitional justice efforts – UN expert, UN News Center, 16 November 2012.

EBRD, Tunisia Country Assessment 2012

Libya: One Year On, Transition Has Progressed but Challenges Remain - UN Envoy, UN News Services, 8 November 2012.

Mohamed Eljarh, Lessons from Libya: Successes, Failures and Challenges, Middle East Online, 15 November 2012.

Libya’s transition: ‘what to expect when you’re electing’, Democracy Digest (National Endowement for Democracy, US), 5 November 2012.

Moussa Grifa, The Libyan Revolution : Establishing a New Political System and The Transition to Statehood, Arab Reform Initiative, September 2012.

Dan Brumberg and Hesham Sallam, The Politics of Security Sector Reform in Egypt, United States Institute of Peace, October 2012.

Thomas Carothers, Nathan J. Brown, The Real Danger for Egyptian Democracy, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, NOVEMBER 12, 2012

Chibli Mallat, Reading the Draft Constitution of Egypt: Setbacks in substance, process, and legitimacy, Ahram Online, 2 December 2012

Dan Murphy, Egypt's political turmoil dimming chances of democratic transition, Christian Science Monitor, 28 November 2012


[1] European Transition Compendium: Online Database
[2] Hassan Mneimneh, Why Democratic Transitions in the Arab World Will Be Harder than in Post-Communist Europe, German Marshall Fund of the United States. http://blog.gmfus.org 25/10/2012.

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

23.500 Syriens en Belgique

La transition démocratique en Egypte se fera avec les “pro-Morsi” ou elle n’aura pas lieu.